10 March 2010
The Government has outlined its plans to jail people convicted
of trading illegally in personal data or knowingly or recklessly
disclosing it. Under the plans the jail terms would be introduced
next April.
Privacy regulator the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has
long campaigned for an increase in penalties for breaches of the
Data Protection Act (DPA). The Government has agreed to back the
proposal and has launched a consultation on the issue.
"The custodial sentences should be set at the maximum available
under the power (i.e. twelve months' imprisonment on summary
conviction and two years' imprisonment on conviction on
indictment)," says the consultation.
The Government also proposes to introduce a new defence to the
offences for which jail terms are being introduced. People who are
engaged in art or journalism can claim exemption from the
rule.
"The additional defence for anyone who can show that he was acting
for the special purposes (as defined by section 3 of the DPA) with
a view to publishing journalistic, literary or artistic material,
in the reasonable belief that the obtaining, disclosing or
procuring was in the public interest should be introduced alongside
the increased penalties," said the consultation.
The Government said that the ICO had been expressing concern about
DPA infringements for commercial gain since 2006. "The Information
Commissioner's 2006 Special Report to Parliament 'What Price
Privacy? The unlawful trade in confidential personal information'
highlighted the corrosive effect of the trade in personal
information," said the consultation. "The report detailed how the
sums of money those engaged in such transactions can make - up to
£120,000 per month in one case. Individuals involved in such a
lucrative trade are unlikely be deterred by a fine only."
"At one point this trade appeared to subside. However, the new
Information Commissioner has recently called for the introduction
of these penalties. The Government has also listened to further
concerns from media organisations about the chilling effect which
such a penalty would have on legitimate investigative journalism,
and created a new defence for those who act for … special
purposes," it said.
The Government said that there are some offences related to the
misuse of personal information that already carry jail terms,
including some in the Identity Cards Act and the Commissioners for
Revenue and Customs Act. "However, the DPA is the central piece of
legislation which governs how personal data should be processed and
we believe it should be this piece of legislation which sets the
standards for offences relating to the knowing or reckless misuse
of personal data," it said.
"The Government therefore believes it is necessary to introduce
the increased penalties available to the courts for three reasons:
to provide a greater deterrent to those who seek to knowingly or
recklessly obtain, disclose or procure the disclosure of personal
data without the consent of the data controller or sell or offer to
sell personal data obtained in that way; to provide public
reassurance that those who are successfully prosecuted may,
depending on the gravity of the offence, be sent to jail; [and] to
achieve parity of approach across a number of disparate pieces of
legislation which deal with similar types of offences," said the
consultation.
The Government plans to introduce the changes in April 2010 at the
same time as the ICO's powers are strengthened by the Criminal
Justice and Immigration Act.

Report on public space CCTV In Scotland
CameraWatch welcomes new interim regulator
Council CCTV coverage increases
CameraWatch CCTV Data Protection Compliance Assurance/Assessment Scheme
Is the public being let down by the CCTV surveillance society?
Data misuse penalties outlined
Date penalties outilined by Government
Expansion plans for monitoring programme
Jail should be an option for serious breaches of data protection
HSBC is fined by the FSA
Non-compliance hits detection rates
CameraWatch responds to recent Scotland Yard report